Power by county
Bayfield, WI: data center power outlook
For Bayfield, Wisconsin, the public grid picture begins with its place in the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Bayfield tops out at 161 kV, over a footprint of 33 mapped substations. In Bayfield, 5 utilities share the retail territory, among them BARRON ELECTRIC COOP, BAYFIELD ELECTRIC COOP, INC, DAHLBERG LIGHT & POWER CO.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- BARRON ELECTRIC COOP, BAYFIELD ELECTRIC COOP, INC, DAHLBERG LIGHT & POWER CO, EAST CENTRAL ENERGY, NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
- ISO / market
- MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator)
- Highest grid access
- 161 kV
- Substations in county
- 33
- Industrial retail rate
- 8.9¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 3 of 5 serving utilities: 8.2 to 9.6¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 982 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 9.7 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 4,391 employed in construction within ~120 km (10 of 11 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Bayfield
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Bayfield, Wisconsin that bears on a large new load. The strongest mapped access in Bayfield is 161 kV, squarely transmission class. Bayfield carries 33 substations, a dense footprint across the county.
For Bayfield, the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 8.9 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Bayfield at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Bayfield that publish a rate range 3 of 5 serving utilities: 8.2 to 9.6¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
Bayfield, Wisconsin shows no interconnection-queue project in the covered feeds, whether from real quiet or a feed not yet loaded. For Bayfield, Wisconsin, the EIA-860M inventory shows no planned or under-construction generation, a measured absence. Grid carbon intensity for Bayfield, via its balancing authority, is 981.982 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Bayfield at 9.69 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Bayfield, about 4,391 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Bayfield figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Bayfield, Wisconsin qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Bayfield, Wisconsin turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Bayfield, Wisconsin traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.