Power by county
Washington, TX: data center power outlook
Washington sits in the ERCOT market (Electric Reliability Council of Texas); what follows is the screening-grade grid picture for Washington, Texas, drawn from public datasets. Counting from the mapped infrastructure, Washington holds 9 mapped substations and reaches 345 kV. Washington is covered by 11 retail service territories, including BARTLETT ELECTRIC COOP, INC, BLUEBONNET ELECTRIC COOP, INC, CENTERPOINT ENERGY.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- BARTLETT ELECTRIC COOP, INC, BLUEBONNET ELECTRIC COOP, INC, CENTERPOINT ENERGY, CITY OF BRENHAM - (TX), CITY OF HEMPSTEAD - (TX), ENTERGY TEXAS INC., FAYETTE ELECTRIC COOP, INC, GUADALUPE VALLEY ELEC COOP INC, MID-SOUTH ELECTRIC COOP ASSN, NAVASOTA VALLEY ELEC COOP, INC, SAN BERNARD ELECTRIC COOP, INC
- ISO / market
- ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas)
- Highest grid access
- 345 kV
- Substations in county
- 9
- Industrial retail rate
- 6.5¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 8 of 11 serving utilities: 5.4 to 10.2¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- 60 MW planned or under constructionUnits filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 734 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 3.2 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 216,451 employed in construction within ~120 kmA large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Washington
Everything here about Washington, Texas comes from public federal and state records, with the gaps left visible. Washington reaches 345 kV, a high-voltage transmission class, at its strongest mapped point of grid access. With 9 substations mapped, Washington has a moderate spread of interconnection points.
Washington falls inside the ERCOT market (Electric Reliability Council of Texas), which governs how its interconnection requests and capacity move. The rate for Washington is the 6.5 cents per kWh state industrial average (EIA-861), the same figure the map colours by. Across Washington, reported per-utility industrial rates cover 8 of 11 serving utilities: 5.4 to 10.2¢/kWh, offered only as context beneath the state figure.
The covered queue feeds list nothing for Washington, Texas, which may be quiet or simply uningested. Washington has 60.2 MW of planned or under-construction generation on file in EIA-860M. The balancing authority covering Washington carries a grid carbon intensity of 734.003 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
Reported freshwater withdrawals for all uses in Washington are 3.21 million gallons per day in the USGS 2015 compilation, existing demand rather than water free for a new load. Around Washington, some 216,451 people work in construction within about a 120 km commute (BLS QCEW), a measure of reach, not of available crews.
These numbers for Washington are screening-grade context for the whole county, drawn from public data with the gaps left visible. Read the figures for Washington, Texas together rather than one at a time: grid access matters less without substations near it, and a quiet queue reads differently inside an organized market than outside one. The next step for Washington, Texas is an address-level interconnection study; the county figures here only narrow where to look. For Washington, Texas, the source log below records where each figure comes from and when it was pulled, keeping the provenance visible.