Power by county
Jeff Davis, TX: data center power outlook
For Jeff Davis, Texas, the public grid picture begins with its place in an area outside an organized wholesale market and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Jeff Davis tops out at 138 kV, over a footprint of 1 mapped substation. In Jeff Davis, 5 utilities share the retail territory, among them AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY, EL PASO ELECTRIC CO, RIO GRANDE ELECTRIC COOP, INC.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY, EL PASO ELECTRIC CO, RIO GRANDE ELECTRIC COOP, INC, SOUTHWEST TEXAS ELEC COOP, INC, TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER CO
- ISO / market
- NON_ISO (Not in an organized wholesale market)
- Highest grid access
- 138 kV
- Substations in county
- 1
- Industrial retail rate
- 6.5¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 3 of 5 serving utilities: 4.6 to 10.2¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 734 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 2.2 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 891 employed in construction within ~120 km (2 of 4 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Jeff Davis
For Jeff Davis, Texas, the following sections turn public grid records into a siting-oriented summary. The strongest mapped access in Jeff Davis is 138 kV, squarely transmission class. Jeff Davis, Texas contains 1 mapped substation, a sparse footprint that concentrates interconnection options at a few points.
There is no organized wholesale market over Jeff Davis, Texas; arrangements run through the serving utility instead. The state industrial average retail rate is 6.5 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Jeff Davis at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Jeff Davis that publish a rate range 3 of 5 serving utilities: 4.6 to 10.2¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
For Jeff Davis, Texas, no queued project appears in the feeds currently covered. The federal EIA-860M inventory files no planned or under-construction generation in Jeff Davis, Texas, a real zero rather than a gap. Grid carbon intensity for Jeff Davis, via its balancing authority, is 734.003 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Jeff Davis at 2.18 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Jeff Davis, about 891 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Jeff Davis figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Jeff Davis, Texas qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Jeff Davis, Texas turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Jeff Davis, Texas traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.