Power by county
Hood, TX: data center power outlook
For Hood, Texas, the public grid picture begins with its place in the ERCOT market (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Hood tops out at 345 kV, over a footprint of 15 mapped substations. In Hood, 8 utilities share the retail territory, among them CITY OF GRANBURY - (TX), FORT BELKNAP ELECTRIC COOP INC, HILCO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC..
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- CITY OF GRANBURY - (TX), FORT BELKNAP ELECTRIC COOP INC, HILCO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC, TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER CO, TRI-COUNTY ELECTRIC COOP, INC (TX), UNITED ELECTRIC COOP SERVICE INC - (TX), WISE ELECTRIC COOP INC
- ISO / market
- ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas)
- Highest grid access
- 345 kV
- Substations in county
- 15
- Industrial retail rate
- 6.5¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 3 of 8 serving utilities: 9.3 to 14.0¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- 4 projects, 761 MW
- Proposed generation
- 200 MW planned or under constructionUnits filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 734 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 15 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 218,593 employed in construction within ~120 kmA large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Hood
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Hood, Texas that bears on a large new load. The highest mapped voltage in Hood is 345 kV, in the high-voltage transmission class. Hood carries 15 substations in the mapped layer, spread across the county.
For Hood, the ERCOT market (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 6.5 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Hood at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Hood that publish a rate range 3 of 8 serving utilities: 9.3 to 14.0¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
On record for Hood are 4 interconnection-queue projects, totalling 760.83 MW of requested capacity. Federal filings (EIA-860M) list 200 MW of generation as planned or under construction in Hood. Grid carbon intensity for Hood, via its balancing authority, is 734.003 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Hood at 15.3 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Hood, about 218,593 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Hood figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Hood, Texas qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Hood, Texas turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Hood, Texas traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.