Power by county
Duval, TX: data center power outlook
For Duval, Texas, the public grid picture begins with its place in the ERCOT market (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Duval tops out at 138 kV, over a footprint of 4 mapped substations. In Duval, 7 utilities share the retail territory, among them AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY, KARNES ELECTRIC COOP INC, MAGIC VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP INC.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY, KARNES ELECTRIC COOP INC, MAGIC VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP INC, MEDINA ELECTRIC COOP, INC, NUECES ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, RIO GRANDE ELECTRIC COOP, INC, SAN PATRICIO ELECTRIC COOP INC
- ISO / market
- ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas)
- Highest grid access
- 138 kV
- Substations in county
- 4
- Industrial retail rate
- 6.5¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 6 of 7 serving utilities: 6.2 to 24.7¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- 15 projects, 3,804 MW
- Proposed generation
- 300 MW planned or under constructionUnits filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 734 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 3.7 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 22,952 employed in construction within ~120 km (8 of 13 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Duval
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Duval, Texas that bears on a large new load. The strongest mapped access in Duval is 138 kV, squarely transmission class. Duval, Texas shows 4 substations in the mapped layer, a thin spread across the county.
For Duval, the ERCOT market (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 6.5 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Duval at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Duval that publish a rate range 6 of 7 serving utilities: 6.2 to 24.7¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
On record for Duval are 15 interconnection-queue projects, totalling 3,803.58 MW of requested capacity. Federal filings (EIA-860M) list 300 MW of generation as planned or under construction in Duval. Grid carbon intensity for Duval, via its balancing authority, is 734.003 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Duval at 3.69 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Duval, about 22,952 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Duval figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Duval, Texas qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Duval, Texas turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Duval, Texas traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.