Power by county
Hardin, TN: data center power outlook
For Hardin, Tennessee, the public grid picture begins with its place in an area outside an organized wholesale market and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Hardin tops out at 161 kV, over a footprint of 11 mapped substations. In Hardin, 6 utilities share the retail territory, among them ALCORN COUNTY ELEC POWER ASSN, CITY OF FLORENCE - (AL), CITY OF LEXINGTON - (TN).
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- ALCORN COUNTY ELEC POWER ASSN, CITY OF FLORENCE - (AL), CITY OF LEXINGTON - (TN), PICKWICK ELECTRIC COOP, TENNESSEE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP, TISHOMINGO COUNTY E P A
- ISO / market
- NON_ISO (Not in an organized wholesale market)
- Highest grid access
- 161 kV
- Substations in county
- 11
- Industrial retail rate
- 6.7¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 3 of 6 serving utilities: 8.3 to 9.3¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 641 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 32 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 23,986 employed in construction within ~120 km (33 of 34 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Hardin
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Hardin, Tennessee that bears on a large new load. The strongest mapped access in Hardin is 161 kV, squarely transmission class. Hardin carries 11 substations in the mapped layer, spread across the county.
No organized wholesale market covers Hardin, Tennessee, so capacity moves through the local utility and bilateral agreements. The state industrial average retail rate is 6.7 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Hardin at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Hardin that publish a rate range 3 of 6 serving utilities: 8.3 to 9.3¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
For Hardin, Tennessee, no queued project appears in the feeds currently covered. No generation is filed as planned or under construction in Hardin, Tennessee in the federal EIA-860M inventory, a measured zero rather than missing data. Grid carbon intensity for Hardin, via its balancing authority, is 641.018 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Hardin at 31.56 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Hardin, about 23,986 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Hardin figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Hardin, Tennessee qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Hardin, Tennessee turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Hardin, Tennessee traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.