Power by county
Yancey, NC: data center power outlook
For Yancey, North Carolina, the public grid picture begins with its place in an area outside an organized wholesale market and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Yancey tops out at 230 kV, over a footprint of 11 mapped substations. In Yancey, 4 utilities share the retail territory, among them DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC, DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS - (NC), FRENCH BROAD ELEC MEMBER CORP.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC, DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS - (NC), FRENCH BROAD ELEC MEMBER CORP, RUTHERFORD ELEC MEMBER CORP
- ISO / market
- NON_ISO (Not in an organized wholesale market)
- Highest grid access
- 230 kV
- Substations in county
- 11
- Industrial retail rate
- 7.8¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 4 serving utilities: 7.8 to 8.3¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 641 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 3.0 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 69,591 employed in construction within ~120 km (39 of 43 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Yancey
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Yancey, North Carolina that bears on a large new load. The strongest mapped access in Yancey is 230 kV, squarely transmission class. Yancey carries 11 substations in the mapped layer, spread across the county.
Yancey, North Carolina lies outside an organized wholesale market, so generation and transmission are arranged bilaterally and through the local utility rather than a central market operator. The state industrial average retail rate is 7.8 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Yancey at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Yancey that publish a rate range 4 serving utilities: 7.8 to 8.3¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
Yancey, North Carolina has nothing in the interconnection queue across the feeds covered here, quiet or uningested. For Yancey, North Carolina, the EIA-860M inventory shows no planned or under-construction generation, a measured absence. Grid carbon intensity for Yancey, via its balancing authority, is 641.018 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Yancey at 3.01 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Yancey, about 69,591 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Yancey figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Yancey, North Carolina qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Yancey, North Carolina turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Yancey, North Carolina traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.