Power by county
Madison, NY: data center power outlook
For Madison, New York, the public grid picture begins with its place in the NYISO market (New York Independent System Operator) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Madison tops out at 345 kV, over a footprint of 21 mapped substations. In Madison, 7 utilities share the retail territory, among them CITY OF SHERRILL - (NY), DELAWARE COUNTY ELEC COOP INC, NEW YORK STATE ELEC & GAS CORP.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- CITY OF SHERRILL - (NY), DELAWARE COUNTY ELEC COOP INC, NEW YORK STATE ELEC & GAS CORP, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP., ONEIDA-MADISON ELEC COOP, INC, OTSEGO ELECTRIC COOP, INC, VILLAGE OF HAMILTON - (NY)
- ISO / market
- NYISO (New York Independent System Operator)
- Highest grid access
- 345 kV
- Substations in county
- 21
- Industrial retail rate
- 9.6¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 2 of 7 serving utilities: 2.5 to 2.7¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- 3 projects, 242 MW
- Proposed generation
- 251 MW planned or under constructionUnits filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 479 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 4.4 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 29,163 employed in construction within ~120 kmA large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Madison
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Madison, New York that bears on a large new load. The highest mapped voltage in Madison is 345 kV, in the high-voltage transmission class. Madison carries 21 substations, a dense footprint across the county.
For Madison, the NYISO market (New York Independent System Operator) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 9.6 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Madison at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Madison that publish a rate range 2 of 7 serving utilities: 2.5 to 2.7¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
On record for Madison are 3 interconnection-queue projects, totalling 241.8 MW of requested capacity. Federal filings (EIA-860M) list 250.7 MW of generation as planned or under construction in Madison. Grid carbon intensity for Madison, via its balancing authority, is 479.212 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Madison at 4.38 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Madison, about 29,163 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Madison figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Madison, New York qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Madison, New York turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Madison, New York traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.