Power by county
Garfield, MT: data center power outlook
For Garfield, Montana, the public grid picture begins with its place in an area outside an organized wholesale market and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Garfield tops out at 69 kV, over a footprint of 1 mapped substation. In Garfield, 6 utilities share the retail territory, among them BIG FLAT ELECTRIC COOP INC, FERGUS ELECTRIC COOP, INC, MCCONE ELECTRIC COOP INC.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- BIG FLAT ELECTRIC COOP INC, FERGUS ELECTRIC COOP, INC, MCCONE ELECTRIC COOP INC, MID-YELLOWSTONE ELEC COOP, INC, NORVAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC, WAPA-- WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
- ISO / market
- NON_ISO (Not in an organized wholesale market)
- Highest grid access
- 69 kV
- Substations in county
- 1
- Industrial retail rate
- 7.0¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 1 of 6 serving utilities: 14.6¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- None on record
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 0 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 12 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 203 employed in construction within ~120 km (3 of 5 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Garfield
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Garfield, Montana that bears on a large new load. Garfield reaches 69 kV at most, which is sub-transmission and typically feeds distribution circuits. Garfield, Montana contains 1 mapped substation, a sparse footprint that concentrates interconnection options at a few points.
There is no organized wholesale market over Garfield, Montana; arrangements run through the serving utility instead. The state industrial average retail rate is 7.0 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Garfield at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Garfield that publish a rate range 1 of 6 serving utilities: 14.6¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
For Garfield, Montana, no queued project appears in the feeds currently covered. No generation is filed as planned or under construction in Garfield, Montana in the federal EIA-860M inventory, a measured zero rather than missing data. Grid carbon intensity for Garfield, via its balancing authority, is 0 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Garfield at 12.36 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Garfield, about 203 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Garfield figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Garfield, Montana qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Garfield, Montana turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Garfield, Montana traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.