Power by county
Sullivan, MO: data center power outlook
For Sullivan, Missouri, the public grid picture begins with its place in the SPP market (Southwest Power Pool) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Sullivan tops out at 161 kV, over a footprint of 13 mapped substations. In Sullivan, 7 utilities share the retail territory, among them CITY OF MILAN - (MO), EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, GRUNDY ELECTRIC COOP, INC.
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- CITY OF MILAN - (MO), EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, GRUNDY ELECTRIC COOP, INC, MACON ELECTRIC COOP, NORTH CENTRAL MO ELEC COOP INC, TRI-COUNTY ELECTRIC COOP ASSN (MO), UNION ELECTRIC CO - (MO)
- ISO / market
- SPP (Southwest Power Pool)
- Highest grid access
- 161 kV
- Substations in county
- 13
- Industrial retail rate
- 8.4¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 3 of 7 serving utilities: 6.9 to 7.6¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- 2 projects, 600 MW
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 1,285 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 3.7 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 4,200 employed in construction within ~120 km (28 of 34 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Sullivan
This page gathers the public grid evidence for Sullivan, Missouri that bears on a large new load. The strongest mapped access in Sullivan is 161 kV, squarely transmission class. Sullivan carries 13 substations in the mapped layer, spread across the county.
For Sullivan, the SPP market (Southwest Power Pool) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 8.4 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Sullivan at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Sullivan that publish a rate range 3 of 7 serving utilities: 6.9 to 7.6¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
On record for Sullivan are 2 interconnection-queue projects, totalling 600 MW of requested capacity. The federal EIA-860M inventory files no planned or under-construction generation in Sullivan, Missouri, a real zero rather than a gap. Grid carbon intensity for Sullivan, via its balancing authority, is 1,285.192 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Sullivan at 3.67 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Sullivan, about 4,200 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Sullivan figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Sullivan, Missouri qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Sullivan, Missouri turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Sullivan, Missouri traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.