Power by county
Grant, MN: data center power outlook
For Grant, Minnesota, the public grid picture begins with its place in the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) and the infrastructure mapped inside the county. Grid access across Grant tops out at 400 kV, over a footprint of 12 mapped substations. In Grant, 7 utilities share the retail territory, among them AGRALITE ELECTRIC COOP, CITY OF ELBOW LAKE - (MN), LAKE REGION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE - (MN).
Grid position at a glance
- Serving utilities
- AGRALITE ELECTRIC COOP, CITY OF ELBOW LAKE - (MN), LAKE REGION ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE - (MN), OTTER TAIL POWER CO, RUNESTONE ELECTRIC ASSN, TRAVERSE ELECTRIC COOP, INC, WAPA-- WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
- ISO / market
- MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator)
- Highest grid access
- 400 kV
- Substations in county
- 12
- Industrial retail rate
- 9.3¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.
- Per-utility rates in county
- 4 of 7 serving utilities: 5.4 to 14.3¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.
- Interconnection queue
- 1 projects, 33 MW
- Proposed generation
- None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.
- Grid carbon intensity
- 982 lb CO2/MWh
- Water withdrawals
- 2.2 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.
- Construction labor near site
- 15,643 employed in construction within ~120 kmA large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.
Grid conditions in Grant
For Grant, Minnesota, the following sections turn public grid records into a siting-oriented summary. The highest mapped voltage in Grant is 400 kV, in the high-voltage transmission class. Grant carries 12 substations in the mapped layer, spread across the county.
For Grant, the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) is the operator that handles interconnection and capacity. The state industrial average retail rate is 9.3 cents per kWh, drawn from EIA-861 and applied to Grant at the state level rather than as a county rate. The serving utilities in Grant that publish a rate range 4 of 7 serving utilities: 5.4 to 14.3¢/kWh, a spread kept separate from the state average.
On record for Grant are 1 interconnection-queue project, totalling 32.5 MW of requested capacity. For Grant, Minnesota, the EIA-860M inventory shows no planned or under-construction generation, a measured absence. Grid carbon intensity for Grant, via its balancing authority, is 981.982 lb CO2 per MWh in eGRID.
USGS 2015 puts freshwater withdrawals across Grant at 2.2 million gallons per day for all uses, a measure of use, not spare supply. Within roughly a 120 km commute of Grant, about 15,643 people are employed in construction (BLS QCEW), which speaks to how far crews for a multi-year build would travel, not to labour known to be free.
Read the Grant figures as screening-grade context: they describe the surrounding grid, not a specific parcel. The numbers for Grant, Minnesota qualify one another, so grid access, substation density, market membership, and rate are meant to be read as a set, not in isolation. Past this screening view, siting in Grant, Minnesota turns on a study of a particular address, something no county-level page can stand in for. Every number shown for Grant, Minnesota traces to a public source listed below, with its retrieval date, so the provenance is auditable rather than asserted.