Iron, MI: data center power outlook

Grid position at a glance

Serving utilities

ALGER-DELTA COOP ELECTRIC ASSN, BAYFIELD ELECTRIC COOP, INC, CITY OF CRYSTAL FALLS, CITY OF NEGAUNEE, CITY OF NORWAY, CITY OF WAKEFIELD - (MI), DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY, NORTHERN STATES POWER CO, ONTONAGON COUNTY R E A, UPPER MICHIGAN ENERGY RESOURCES CORP., UPPER PENINSULA POWER COMPANY, VILLAGE OF BARAGA - (MI), VILLAGE OF L'ANSE - (MI), WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO, WPPI ENERGY

ISO / market

MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator)

Highest grid access

138 kV

Substations in county

10

Industrial retail rate

8.6¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.

Per-utility rates in county

5 of 15 serving utilities: 5.3 to 12.6¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.

Interconnection queue

1 projects, 23 MW

Proposed generation

None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.

Grid carbon intensity

982 lb CO2/MWh

Water withdrawals

1.4 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.

Construction labor near site

8,323 employed in construction within ~120 kmA large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.

Grid conditions in Iron

The material below frames Iron, Michigan for a prospective large load, drawing only on public sources. At 138 kV, Iron sits in the transmission class that a large load would look to. The mapped layer places 10 substations across Iron, a moderate density.

Interconnection over Iron runs through the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) and its rules. For Iron, the rate shown is the state industrial average of 8.6 cents per kWh (EIA-861), a state figure and not a county-specific one. Beneath that state average, the utilities serving Iron that report an industrial rate span 5 of 15 serving utilities: 5.3 to 12.6¢/kWh, shown as context and never as the county rate.

The queue feeds show 1 project for Iron, totalling 22.5 MW of requested capacity. Iron, Michigan has no EIA-860M generation on file, which reads as zero rather than as a gap. Iron sits under a balancing authority that eGRID puts at 981.982 lb CO2 per MWh.

Iron withdrew 1.37 million gallons per day for all uses in the USGS 2015 data, which counts demand, not headroom. About 8,323 people are employed in construction within a 120 km commute of Iron (BLS QCEW), which frames staffing distance rather than free labour.

For Iron, treat this as screening-grade county context useful for narrowing a search rather than settling a site. Taken together, the figures for Iron, Michigan describe the grid around a prospective site, drawn from public data with their gaps left visible on purpose. To move past screening in Iron, Michigan, a specific address needs its own interconnection study, which this page does not attempt. The figures for Iron, Michigan refresh as their public datasets do, and the exact sources and dates sit in the source log below this section.

Sources