Washington, IN: data center power outlook

Grid position at a glance

Serving utilities

CLARK COUNTY RURAL E M C - (IN), DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC, HARRISON COUNTY RURAL E M C, JACKSON COUNTY RURAL E M C - (IN), ORANGE COUNTY RURAL E M C

ISO / market

MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator)

Highest grid access

765 kV

Substations in county

9

Industrial retail rate

8.9¢/kWhState-level EIA-861 industrial average. The map colours by this, not by a per-county rate.

Per-utility rates in county

4 of 5 serving utilities: 7.9 to 11.4¢/kWhLowest to highest industrial rate among the utilities serving this county (EIA-861 Sales to Ultimate Customers). A spread, not the county’s rate, and it covers only the serving utilities that report one.

Interconnection queue

3 projects, 465 MW

Proposed generation

None on file (EIA-860M)Units filed with EIA as planned or under construction (Form EIA-860M). Declared intent from the federal inventory, not the interconnection queue and not guaranteed capacity.

Grid carbon intensity

982 lb CO2/MWh

Water withdrawals

3.8 Mgal/dAll uses, freshwater. Water already withdrawn locally, not water available for a new load.

Construction labor near site

62,162 employed in construction within ~120 km (45 of 49 counties reporting)A large build needs hundreds of skilled construction workers on site for one to three years. A county with few of them within commuting range means bussing crews in, per diem, and housing, which is real cost and schedule risk. This counts people employed in construction within about a 120 km drive (BLS QCEW), summed across nearby counties. It is not labor known to be available: most are already committed to other projects, and no public data reveals who is free.

Grid conditions in Washington

The material below frames Washington, Indiana for a prospective large load, drawing only on public sources. Grid access in Washington extends to 765 kV, the extra-high-voltage class. The mapped layer places 9 substations across Washington, a moderate density.

Interconnection over Washington runs through the MISO market (Midcontinent Independent System Operator) and its rules. For Washington, the rate shown is the state industrial average of 8.9 cents per kWh (EIA-861), a state figure and not a county-specific one. Beneath that state average, the utilities serving Washington that report an industrial rate span 4 of 5 serving utilities: 7.9 to 11.4¢/kWh, shown as context and never as the county rate.

The queue feeds show 3 projects for Washington, totalling 465 MW of requested capacity. Nothing is on file for Washington, Indiana in EIA-860M as planned or under construction, which counts as a measured zero. Washington sits under a balancing authority that eGRID puts at 981.982 lb CO2 per MWh.

Washington withdrew 3.78 million gallons per day for all uses in the USGS 2015 data, which counts demand, not headroom. About 62,162 people are employed in construction within a 120 km commute of Washington (BLS QCEW), which frames staffing distance rather than free labour.

For Washington, treat this as screening-grade county context useful for narrowing a search rather than settling a site. Taken together, the figures for Washington, Indiana describe the grid around a prospective site, drawn from public data with their gaps left visible on purpose. To move past screening in Washington, Indiana, a specific address needs its own interconnection study, which this page does not attempt. The figures for Washington, Indiana refresh as their public datasets do, and the exact sources and dates sit in the source log below this section.

Sources